AR aging, visit-to-deposit, and where the money sits

The aging report that looks fine landed Monday. Deposits still feel thin. The columns and the bank disagree.

Aging only times bills that already exist as receivables. Cash cares about the whole trip from visit to bank. Unbilled work, slow claims, and late deposits can leave you short while the report still looks current. We would start the clock at the visit, not at the column that feels comforting.

Payroll and "where's my money?"

The receivable total looks big. Deposits look smaller. You cannot tell which number to trust.

AR is a ledger story. Collections are bank truth. When those disagree, trust the bank first, then find which bucket on the AR report is fiction. We would reconcile the receivable total to deposits before you spend against a number that has not landed.

Profitable on paper, broke in the bank

Someone reshuffled the aging buckets again. The same dollars are still waiting with fresher dates.

Nobody pays you for appearing on a report. Work owned lists by cause and insurance company. Cleanup that only moves dollars between columns leaves the same money uncollected. Status and cause beat age alone. We would rather see fewer balances fixed for good than a prettier aging page.

The history shows the same claim out again and again. Nobody can say why the next try would work.

Yes. Put a stop rule in place so the team pauses when the same claim fails the same way. Resubmitting a known dead path burns time and hides the real problem. Fix the cause once, then send a corrected claim, not another copy of the broken one.

Denials, unpaid claims, and insurance silence

A dying claim sits in the current column. It looks young. You know it is not.

Yes. Resubmits and date resets can make an old claim look new. The report sorts by a date your system chose, not always by the true life of the bill. Read real claim age before you call a balance current. We would not plan cash on a column that got younger without getting closer to paid.

Visits happened. Charges never left. Aging still looks calm because those dollars never appeared.

Usually no. Unbilled work never starts the AR clock, so the report misses the first leak. Visits without charges can starve deposits while aging looks fine. We would reconcile yesterday's visits to charges before you call the report current.

The AR total keeps climbing. You cannot point to money that will actually land.

Overstated AR runs one direction. Dead balances left open, disputed claims still counted as collectible, and write-offs that never got written off all inflate the story. Separate collectible, disputed, and dead before you trust the total. We would rather see an honest smaller number than a big one that will never pay.

The payer average looks fine. A few large balances never move. Deposits still lag.

Averages hide stuck insurance companies and only count claims that finished. An average that looks fine can sit on top of a few large balances that never move. Read the stuck dollars, not only the mean. We would chase the quiet large ones before you celebrate the average.

Money hit the bank last week. The visit still shows open. Nobody knows which is true.

Posting is recording the insurance payment or denial against the visit. When posting lags, the AR report lies, denials hide, patient balances rot, and cash looks late even when money already landed. We would clear the posting backlog before you trust aging or chase dollars that are already in the account.

Billing company – hire, fire, or oversee?

The work was real. The deposit is not. You want the dollars named, not another aging column.

Most of it sits in a few quiet places: unbilled visits, claims still moving, payments waiting to post, and patient balances on statements. Aging buckets alone cannot see work that never started the AR clock. Put a dollar figure on each step from visit to bank. We would fix the step that holds the most money before you argue about which column looks current.

Start here if you still need to name the first worry · FAQ hub